« Google Print: Hypos for My Copyright Class | Main | Women’s Bodies: Violence, Security, Capabilities - Part II »

November 19, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c031153ef00d834974f2569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Foreign Law and Constitutional Interpretation:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Pithlord

As a Canadian, I can confirm that our courts have always cited US case law, both on constitutional issues and common law ones, without considering it binding, and without any issue about legitimacy. And Canadinas are rather touchy on the subject of independence from the United States.

The Federalist Papers do not confine their attention to English common law. They talk about classical examples, the Holy Roman Empire, Switzerland and a number of other examples.

If you can cite a law review article, why not a decision by the Australian High Court? Once again, the Bush administration stirs up tribalism for poltical advantage, and smears the courts by failing to make a distinction between persuasive and binding authority.

The comments to this entry are closed.