« Google Print: Hypos for My Copyright Class | Main | Women’s Bodies: Violence, Security, Capabilities - Part II »

November 19, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c031153ef00d834974f2569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Foreign Law and Constitutional Interpretation:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Pithlord

As a Canadian, I can confirm that our courts have always cited US case law, both on constitutional issues and common law ones, without considering it binding, and without any issue about legitimacy. And Canadinas are rather touchy on the subject of independence from the United States.

The Federalist Papers do not confine their attention to English common law. They talk about classical examples, the Holy Roman Empire, Switzerland and a number of other examples.

If you can cite a law review article, why not a decision by the Australian High Court? Once again, the Bush administration stirs up tribalism for poltical advantage, and smears the courts by failing to make a distinction between persuasive and binding authority.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.