« A Mark Heyrman Podcast: "Why the Legal Standard for Involuntary Commitment to Mental Hospitals Doesn't Matter (Much)" | Main | Gift Giving and other Transfers »
Richard Epstein recently published a column on FT.com's New Technology Policy Forum about the Patent Reform Act of 2007. He argues that changes to the injunction rule and damage rule in the PRA are "a one-two combination that would dampen patent innovation." Read the column for yourself here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/500611/23270836
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Epstein on the Patent Reform Act of 2007:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
If anything can be done with the patent laws to make patent lawyers less anal retentive, it should be seriously considered.
Posted by: Kimball Corson | November 29, 2007 at 09:18 AM
If any reforms of the patent law, such as these, could work toward making patent lawyers less anal retentive, they should be seeriously considered.
Posted by: Kimball Corson | November 29, 2007 at 09:22 AM
Sorry for the double comment. The first one showed an error in posting and did not post until after I set the second one off.
Posted by: Kimball Corson | November 29, 2007 at 09:24 AM