Home | Previous Post: A Mark Heyrman Podcast: "Why the Legal Standard for Involuntary Commitment to Mental Hospitals Doesn't Matter (Much)" | Next Post: Gift Giving and other Transfers
Richard Epstein recently published a column on FT.com's New Technology Policy Forum about the Patent Reform Act of 2007. He argues that changes to the injunction rule and damage rule in the PRA are "a one-two combination that would dampen patent innovation." Read the column for yourself here.
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
The University of Chicago Law School | 1111 East 60th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637 | 773.702.9494
If anything can be done with the patent laws to make patent lawyers less anal retentive, it should be seriously considered.
Posted by: Kimball Corson | November 29, 2007 at 09:18 AM
If any reforms of the patent law, such as these, could work toward making patent lawyers less anal retentive, they should be seeriously considered.
Posted by: Kimball Corson | November 29, 2007 at 09:22 AM
Sorry for the double comment. The first one showed an error in posting and did not post until after I set the second one off.
Posted by: Kimball Corson | November 29, 2007 at 09:24 AM