« Epstein in Regulation | Main | Conspiracy Theories »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c031153ef00e54fe372c48833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Video: Cass Sunstein on the 2nd Amendment:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
This right is only mysterious if you're a yankee liberal who didn't notice the Founding Fathers didn't just have a letter-writing campaign but actually shot at British soldiers once in a while as part of a guerilla struggle against a standing army of occupation. When they weren't doing that they were defending their families and their wives' honor from the depradations of savage Indians and low life criminal elements.
Posted by: Roach | January 28, 2008 at 04:40 PM
Professor,
A collective right of the people to bear arms in defense of their state or nation implies that an individual right exists to do the same. I can't imagine how a collective might defend itself against an aggressor if it is comprised of individuals who are denied the right to bear arms. Thus, one really is not forced to choose between two readings of the 2nd Amd. The first reading, that "militia" entails the right of the people as a collective to self defense, is given meaning by the second reading, that individuals shall be allowed to keep a and bear guns.
Posted by: Grag | February 04, 2008 at 10:15 AM