« Solving the Last-Foot Problem: The Roku Netflix Player | Main | Cellphone Fines »

June 12, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c031153ef00e5536977be8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Empirical Scholarship and the Future of the Voting Rights Act:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

FrankMCook

I claim no knowledge or experience in this area, but if Congress had created an agency with the power to impose additional duties in geographic areas where the agency determined there was need to do so, wouldn't the Courts give great deference to the agency's findings? Are we going to second guess Congress to a greater extent if it chooses to make the determination directly?

Kimball Corson

An implicit question here is, in the absence of "wholly sufficient" empirical data, must it be that no action should be taken when the consensus judgment of those informed and willing to address the issue clearly agree there is a problem? Data can always be better, available in larger quantities and come from better sources. Where do we draw the line here, especially if a constitutional issue is involved?

The comments to this entry are closed.