« Solving the Last-Foot Problem: The Roku Netflix Player | Main | Cellphone Fines »

June 12, 2008


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Empirical Scholarship and the Future of the Voting Rights Act:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I claim no knowledge or experience in this area, but if Congress had created an agency with the power to impose additional duties in geographic areas where the agency determined there was need to do so, wouldn't the Courts give great deference to the agency's findings? Are we going to second guess Congress to a greater extent if it chooses to make the determination directly?

Kimball Corson

An implicit question here is, in the absence of "wholly sufficient" empirical data, must it be that no action should be taken when the consensus judgment of those informed and willing to address the issue clearly agree there is a problem? Data can always be better, available in larger quantities and come from better sources. Where do we draw the line here, especially if a constitutional issue is involved?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)