« Student Blogger - When Old Is Not Gold: The Exclusionary Rule Debate Revisited | Main | Antitrust Updates: Google Book Search; Section 2 Symposium; The Mediated Book »

April 28, 2009


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Diseases and National Borders:


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Interesting piece. The problem with your analysis are the preconditions for the "globalist" responses aren't met in significant cases. Let's think of a concrete example.

China, which entered the WHO in 1972, essentially adopted a nationalist response in 2001 to the SARS epidemic. Not only did they try to conceal the outbreak of SARS, but they also prevented the WHO from coming in and performing necessary analysis in the initial stages. As a result, China not only endangered the lives of millions of Chinese, but essentially decimated the nearby economies of Hong Kong and Taiwan.

Thus, my question is: What if a country in the global milieu doesn't respond (either for lack of technology or for political reasons)? Just like in prisoner's dilemma (with some conditions), global cooperation in that situation would benefit every country. If one link in the chain breaks, and there is way to force compliance, the entire system breaks down to the default anyway.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.