« Justice Kennedy and the School District Cases | Main | Roberts, Alito and the Rule of Law »

June 28, 2007


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Do you have any idea how preposterous this entire analysis sounds after the rulings that have come down this week? Roberts and Alito are content to let precedents stand? Are you mad? This term has been a killing field for precedent.

Burke and Oakeshott? Give over, already.



As Justice Scalia was quite correct to observe in Hein: "honoring stare decisis requires more than beating Flast to a pulp." The Court overruled Flast in every sense of the word "overrule" except to actually write the words "Flast is overruled." While the debate was heated, the substantive difference between Scalia and Roberts in Hein was virtually non-existent. Is the difference between minimalism and activism just a matter of semantics?

I do agree with you that in some cases there is a measurable difference between the aggressiveness of Scalia and Thomas on one hand and Roberts and Alito on the other. Carhart would be one example, where Scalia and Thomas would overrule Roe completely whereas Roberts and Alito have yet to show their hand. But I have serious doubts that Hein, which you cite as the case-in-point, is a good example of this difference.

The comments to this entry are closed.