Over on the Columbia Law Review's online Sidebar, Chicago professors Adam Cox and Thomas Miles are involved in a debate about their January 2008 CLR article "Judging The Voting Rights Act." In that piece, Thomas and Adam write that they provided "the first systematic evidence that judicial ideology and race are closely related to findings of liability in voting rights cases." In so doing, they called into question the core findings of Ellen D. Katz & Anna Baldwin's report, "Documenting Discrimination in Voting: Judicial Findings Under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act Since 1982;" Katz and Baldwin responded to Cox and Miles with a reply in Sidebar, and Cox and Miles have responded to that reply with one of their own.
« Video: Cass Sunstein and Eugene Volokh on Information Cocoons | Main | Solving the Last-Foot Problem: The Roku Netflix Player »
June 04, 2008
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Search
Recent Posts
- Notice and Comment, Behavioral Economics, and United States v. Texas
- Friedrichs, Free-Riding, and Life After the Agency Shop
- The Tax Returns of the Top 400: A Deeper Dive
- The Twilight of Tax Sunsets?
- An Alaska Tax Puzzle
- Vanguard Fund Fees To "Quadruple"? (Not So Fast)
- A "Duty" to Minimize Taxes?
- Tinkering with the Tax Court
- An Exam-Grading Hypothetical for Affirmative Action's Supreme Court Test
- Epstein on Thomas Piketty’s 'Capital in the Twenty-First Century'
Recent Comments
- Eric Rasmusen on A "Duty" to Minimize Taxes?
- Leandra Lederman on Tinkering with the Tax Court
- Leandra Lederman on Tinkering with the Tax Court
- Leandra Lederman on Tinkering with the Tax Court
- Thjohnsoniii on Financing Lawsuits
- dcoleman on Apple v. Samsung: What Are Patents Good For?
- dcoleman on Video: Law School Faculty on United States v. Jones
- Stephen Schweizer on Ambiguity in Legal Interpretation: Frank Easterbrook's reaction
- Stephen Schweizer on Apple v. Samsung: What Are Patents Good For?
- Kayj on The 14th Amendment Meets the Bankruptcy Code
Categories
- Abebe, Daniel (4)
- Audio/Video (138)
- Baird, Douglas (9)
- Baude, Will (31)
- Ben-Shahar, Omri (7)
- Bradford, Anu (7)
- Buss, Emily (3)
- Case, Mary Anne (6)
- Clinical Programs (7)
- Cox, Adam (4)
- Currie, David (5)
- Davis, Alicia (1)
- Debate (32)
- Dixon, Rosalind (3)
- Easterbrook, Frank (2)
- Epstein, Richard (68)
- Faculty Posts (66)
- Fennell, Lee (12)
- Friends of Chicago (134)
- Futterman, Craig (3)
- Gersen, Jacob (3)
- Ginsburg, Tom (8)
- Guest Bloggers (69)
- Harcourt, Bernard (17)
- Henderson, M. Todd (27)
- Heyrman, Mark (2)
- Huq, Aziz (2)
- LaCroix, Alison (7)
- Leiter, Brian (30)
- Leslie, Jeff (1)
- Levmore, Saul (73)
- Live Blog (3)
- Malani, Anup (10)
- Masur, Jonathan (10)
- McAdams, Richard (15)
- Miles, Thomas (5)
- Nussbaum, Martha (41)
- Picker, Randy (156)
- Porat, Ariel (3)
- Posner, Eric (106)
- Posner, Richard (28)
- Samaha, Adam (4)
- Sanders, Steve (4)
- Schill, Michael (1)
- Siegler, Alison (1)
- Stone, Geoffrey (88)
- Stone, Randolph (1)
- Strahilevitz, Lior (29)
- Strauss, David (5)
- Student Bloggers (163)
- Suk, Julie (1)
- Weisbach, David (3)
- Woltjen, Maria (1)
- Wood, Diane (2)
Great article, I am really curious to read some other attorneys thoughts on the subject.
Posted by: Chicago Personal Injury Lawyers | June 04, 2008 at 09:46 PM