« Ambiguity in Legal Interpretation: Reply to William Eskridge | Main | Ambiguity--Posner's Comment »

April 28, 2010


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


From a practicing lawyer's point of view, the interesting question is whether phrasing your argument in terms of ordinary readers would help when one is trying to persuade a judge to read a statute contrary to his predilections. I suspect the short answer is that it couldn't hurt.

The comments to this entry are closed.